Okay, so, Versace rectangle glasses. Let’s talk about ’em. You see ’em everywhere, right? Or at least, I feel like *I* see ’em everywhere. And honestly? I’m not entirely sure how I feel.
First off, Versace? Iconic. No question. That Medusa head? Instantly recognizable. It screams “I have taste… and probably money.” But rectangle glasses? They’re kinda… ubiquitous. Like, *everyone’s* rocking some form of rectangle frame these days. So, does Versace just slap their logo on it and call it a day? Is it worth the, uh, hefty price tag? Hmm.
I was browsing around (read: endlessly scrolling through online shops, as one does), and I saw a few different models. The VE1274? Seems pretty classic, you know? Straightforward rectangle. Then there’s the VE3303, described as “lightweight & comfortable.” Which, okay, comfort is key. Nobody wants glasses digging into their face all day. But “comfortable” doesn’t exactly scream *Versace*, does it? It sounds… practical. Which is fine, I guess. But kinda boring.
And then there’s the VE3354. “Audacious” is how they describe ’em. Audacious Versace frames embodying legendary Italian flair and opulent design? Now *that’s* more like it! Acetate, full rim, the whole shebang. But still… a rectangle. Are they *really* that audacious just because they’re rectangle? Or are they just… Versace-fied rectangles?
Then I stumbled upon the VE2245 sunglasses. Semi-rimless! Now *that’s* a bit more interesting. “Sleekly narrow Italian-made glasses,” says Nordstrom. Italian-made? Always a plus. Adjustable? Also a plus, because let’s be real, not everyone’s face is perfectly symmetrical. (Mine certainly isn’t!)
But here’s the thing. I kinda dig the simplicity of a rectangle frame. It’s classic. It’s clean. It can be dressed up or down. It’s… safe. Maybe too safe for Versace? Maybe the brand is trying to appeal to a broader audience. Or maybe I’m just overthinking it. (Probably.)